Some dyno numbers

laz2447 · Post by **laz2447** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:50 am

Going tonight to get the car dyno'ed. I'll post up the results in this thread when I get home.

Mustang Dyno @ Speednation, McDonald Pa.
60* Temps At Test Time
1,040' Elevation

Mods:
Brand New Plugs, Distributor Cap/Rotor, Fuel Filter, PCV
FRPP 9MM Wires
Moroso CAI
Mac 1 5/8" Ceramic Shorty Headers
Mac 2.5" O/R H-Pipe
Flowmaster American Thunder 2.5 Cat-Back

big frank · Post by **big frank** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 11:36 am

laz2447 wrote:Going tonight to get the car dyno'ed. I'll post up the results in this thread when I get home.

Mustang Dyno @ Speed Nation, McDonald Pa.
60* Temps At Test Time

Mods:
Brand New Plugs, Distributor Cap/Rotor, Fuel Filter, PCV
FRPP 9MM Wires
Moroso CAI
Mac 1 5/8" Ceramic Shorty Headers
Mac 2.5" O/R H-Pipe
Flowmaster American Thunder 2.5 Cat-Back

Sweet. Would like to see waht you are putting down. Waht is your elevation? We will need to know if your numbers are corrected or uncorrected also.

Frank

Mike S. · Post by **Mike S.** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 4:09 pm

I'll take a guess: 205-210 WHP.

-Mike S.

ceetwarrior · Post by **ceetwarrior** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 7:01 pm

Yep.

DUDE, sweet signature Mike S!!!

93COBRAinAZ · Post by **93COBRAinAZ** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:24 pm

I'll say 231hp and 290ft lbs.

Post by **BADBOY** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 2:00 am

I thought you were going to post dyno numbers tonight.

laz2447 · Post by **laz2447** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:03 pm

Sorry about the late reply guys. Long story short this guys shop was not where the directions and his web site said he was. Which right away I was leary of even going there.

Anyway here are the results:

1st Pull:

195 RWHP (WC)
247 RWTQ (WC)

2nd Pull:

196 RWHP (WC)
246 RWTQ (WC)

3rd Pull: (Zero - 60mph test)

6.29 Seconds

4th Pull: 1/4 Mile test

15.09 Seconds

While the times for the 0-60 and 1/4 mile are up for driver skill debate of course, I'm really disappointed to not break the 200 RWHP mark. When reading about some of your cars with similar set-ups and seeing what you all are making.

Any thoughts, opinions and suggestions for me?

93COBRAinAZ · Post by **93COBRAinAZ** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:41 pm

I am very surprised with your results, those numbers are less that my stock 1993 Notch made. If I were you I would do a compression test and leakdown for starters. Check the IAC, clean the throttle body and MAF, and maybe test the injectors. That just can't be right.

ceetwarrior · Post by **ceetwarrior** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:52 pm

Dude, it's right. What was your altitude you dynoed at? What type of dyno was it on?

I just got my done on AWD Dyno Dynamics Dyno.

At 6000ft:

235HP Dynojet Correction 40% or whatever
221HP Actual Corrected 30% for 6000ft loss
154HP UNCORRECTED

With my little 154HP I can't even get out of the 15's here!!

Disapointing, lol. But did you guys see that Top Gear where they tested the GT500. It dynoed at 445HP then he threw his '67 GT 390 (325HP) and it only had 250HP, but would probably run 14's in the quarter.

Mike S. · Post by **Mike S.** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:58 pm

My estimate was low because Laz stated he was going to a Mustang dyno, and those things always read 20-25HP lower than a Dynojet, which are more common and produce most all of the published numbers.

-Mike S.

93COBRAinAZ · Post by **93COBRAinAZ** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:23 pm

My car is bone stock and runs 13's

ceetwarrior · Post by **ceetwarrior** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:43 pm

You suck.

93COBRAinAZ wrote:My car is bone stock and runs 13's

big frank · Post by **big frank** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 3:44 pm

ceetwarrior wrote:You suck.

93COBRAinAZ wrote:My car is bone stock and runs 13's

There is a hell of a elevation distance between you guys. HArdly apples to apples.

As far as the origional poster's numbers, I say it's about right for uncorrected numbers, depending on what dyno he ran on, and the guy running the dyno. Geeze guys, these cars aren't race cars. They are rated for 235 flywheel HP, and even though they make more than that, you can't expect them to make that at the wheels.

I know some guys will say they make more stock than that, but it really make a big difference on what dyno, who is running it, and how it's calibrated.

laz2447 · Post by **laz2447** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:54 pm

My buddy dyno'ed his 93 LX before me and make 181 rwhp and 224 rwtq...his car has the cobra intake, bbk cold air, long tubes, catted h, cat back, 9mm wires...

Not mention 120,000 miles more than mine...some more food for thought...

I know what these cars were supposed to put down and what they are able to do. All I am saying is I am not sure what the right numbers should be? I hear Mustang Dyno's are low, Dyno-jets are high...

I guess its up to individual opinion...some of you say of yeah thats dead on!

Other say OMG there is something def wrong!

So what gives?

Post by **BADBOY** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:24 pm

He was mine when I had it dynoed.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/973a ... 226a96.htm

Some dyno numbers

Some dyno numbers

Re: Some dyno numbers